Arguments Reiterated

Argument I

Premise 1:

It is Christ's stance to judge the goodness or evilness of a teaching by the works said teaching produces¹.

Premise 2:

Christ's word does not pass away nor will it be excused².

Conclusion:

The stance of judging a teaching based on the goodness or evilness produced by the teaching in question cannot be excused and will not pass away.

Argument II

Premise 1:

Goodness is "[b]eing positive or desirable in nature."³

Premise 2:

The works directly produced by the teachings which promote monogamous gay couples partnering for life and founding a family upon the concepts of love, compassion, kindness, long suffering, etc. are 1) the creation of committed, stable relationships⁴; and 2) the creation of familial units fully capable of successfully raising healthy offspring⁵ (of their own, via surrogacy, or through adoption).

Premise 3:

Committed, stable relationships and familial units capable of successfully raising healthy offspring are "positive [and] desirable in nature."

Conclusion:

The works directly produced by the teachings which promote monogamous gay couples partnering for life and founding a family upon the concepts of love, compassion, kindness, long suffering, etc. (which shall hereafter be referred to as "gay marriage") are good.

Argument III

Premise 1:

see Argument I, Premise 1

Premise 2:

see Argument II, Conclusion

Conclusion:

The concept of gay marriage is good.

Argument IV

Premise 1:

see Argument I, Conclusion

Premise 2:

see Argument III, Conclusion

Conclusion:

No other teaching can excuse the concept of gay marriage from being good.

¹Matthew 7:15-20, 3 Nephi 14:15-20

²D&C 1:38

³http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/good (The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition.)

⁴What is the nature of same-sex relationships? - American Psychological Association

⁵Can lesbians and gay men be good parents? -American Psychological Association.